iluvfreetools
Site & safety46 of 46

Risk assessments, method statements, SWMS and job hazard analyses, for the UK, US, Australia and Canada. Finished documents, no empty boxes left for you.

All 46 ›
Structure & materials35 of 35

Steel, timber, concrete, brickwork, boards, groundworks and roofs. Section data, indicative sizing, quantities and the reference tables you normally go hunting for.

All 35 ›
Home & property32 of 32

See what it would look like before you commit, then work out what it takes. Upload a photo of your own wall, drive or house and try things on it.

All 32 ›
Invoices & docs20 of 20

Invoices, quotes, receipts and the rest of the paperwork, generated properly. No account, no watermark, and Download is the only button.

All 20 ›
Money & tax39 of 39

Wages, mortgages, tax and the everyday sums. What you actually take home, what it actually costs, and what you actually owe.

All 39 ›
People & hours46 of 46

Rotas, rosters and schedules, holiday and PTO, timesheets and staff paperwork. The admin that eats a Sunday evening, done in ten minutes.

All 46 ›
Business & marketing50 of 50

Starting up, getting found and keeping the admin straight. Everything downloadable, nothing paywalled at the last step.

All 50 ›
PDF & documents27 of 27

Merge, split, crop, sign, number and compress. Everything runs in your browser, so the contract you open here never reaches a server.

All 27 ›
Image tools24 of 24

Convert, resize, compress, crop and adjust. All of it on your own machine, with no upload, no account and no watermark on anything.

All 24 ›
Text & dates20 of 20

Word counts, case, days between dates, working days and ages. The ten-second look-ups, with no account and nothing stored.

All 20 ›
Random & party27 of 27

Secret Santa, draws, brackets, sweepstakes, printables and party quantities. The bit that is just for fun, done properly.

All 27 ›
Training & tests21 of 21

Practice tests for the cards and licences that decide whether you can work. Every answer cites the guidance it came from, not a forum.

All 21 ›

Word frequency

Free. No account, no email, nothing uploaded.

0 words.
Count
Groups "manage", "manages" and "managing" into one row. Every row lists the forms that went into it.
Most used nothing yet

Paste some text to count.

Runs on this device. Nothing uploaded.

Worked out on this device, by this page. Nothing you typed was sent anywhere or stored, and closing the tab loses it.

Next in the same job

A list of single words answers the wrong question

Nobody repeats "risk". They repeat "risk assessment". Count words on their own and the phrase that is actually doing the repeating disappears, split across two unremarkable rows, while the top of the list fills with "the" and "of".

So this counts phrases too: every two and three word run in the text. That is the list you can act on, and it is the list an SEO check actually needs, because no search engine has ever cared how often you wrote "the".

"Manage" and "managing" are the same habit

Counted separately they are three or four unremarkable rows. Counted together they are one obvious one. That needs the word endings stripping, which is a rough instrument: strip too hard and "university" and "universe" end up in the same row.

So it only removes the endings that genuinely mean the same word in a different place in a sentence, it is a switch rather than the default, and every row lists the forms that went into it. A total you cannot check is a total you should not trust.

On keyword density, briefly

There is no target percentage. There never was an official one, and search engines stopped rewarding density well over a decade ago. What they do now is treat conspicuous repetition as a signal that a page was written for a machine.

The useful threshold is a human one: past about 4% of the text, a reader starts to notice. If a term is above that, the fix is not to delete instances until the number comes down. It is to find the sentences that would read better with a pronoun, or with nothing at all, which usually turns out to be most of them.

How much text you need

A few hundred words at minimum. In a paragraph, one word used twice is already top of the list, and that is arithmetic rather than a finding. The tool says so rather than letting you draw a conclusion from six sentences.

The variety number

Distinct words over total words. Ordinary prose lands around 40 to 50%. Below roughly 30% a small handful of words are carrying the whole piece, which is almost always several sentences saying the same thing in the same shape rather than any individual word being overused.

That one is worth reading the piece back for, rather than editing against. It is the one measure here that points at structure instead of vocabulary.

Everything runs on your own machine. Nothing is uploaded and nothing is stored, so an unpublished draft is safe to paste.

Common questions

Why is the top of my list full of "the" and "of"?

Because they are the commonest words in every piece of English ever written, so they tell you nothing about yours. Leave common words out, which is the default here, and the list becomes about your subject rather than about the language.

The single word counts do not show the repetition I can hear.

They usually do not, because people repeat phrases rather than words. Nobody repeats "risk", they repeat "risk assessment", and counting single words splits that across two unremarkable rows. Switch to two or three word phrases and the thing you can hear will normally be at the top.

What does "count word endings together" do?

It puts "manage", "manages", "managing" and "managed" in one row rather than four. Four rows of one look like nothing; one row of four looks like a habit. The endings are stripped roughly rather than by dictionary, so each row lists the forms that went into it and you can check the total.

What is a reasonable percentage for a keyword?

There is no official number and anyone quoting one is guessing. As a rule of thumb, past about 4% of the text a person starts to notice, which is the only threshold that matters. Search engines stopped rewarding density many years ago and now treat obvious repetition as a negative signal, so writing to a target is worse than not thinking about it at all.

What does the "words that are different" percentage mean?

Distinct words divided by total words. Ordinary prose sits somewhere around 40 to 50%. Much below 30% usually means several sentences are saying the same thing in the same way, which is worth reading back rather than editing word by word.

How much text do I need for this to mean anything?

A few hundred words at least. In a short passage a word used twice is already at the top of the list, and that says nothing about the writing. The tool tells you when there is not enough to conclude anything.

Does it count "don't" as one word or two?

One. Apostrophes are kept inside a word, including the curly apostrophe that text pasted from Word carries, which otherwise turns every contraction into two fragments and quietly inflates the count.

Does the text I paste go anywhere?

No. It runs in your browser on your own machine, with no server and no account, and nothing is stored. An unpublished draft is safe to paste.